Michael Jay: Ron, you were
a bit upset by my review of the first three books in your
series where I stated:
Quote: |
The
routines these books teach requires the student to
follow them, almost word for word, to get the full
punch out of them. Unfortunately, this will lead anyone
doing one of these routines to be a clone of everyone
else who does that particular routine - a weakness. |
Why do you feel that copying a routine, word
for word, is not like a cloning of one magician to the next
when performing a routine?
RBauer: Michael...
Please don't let that little incident at the
restaurant lead you to conclude I was a bit upset. I still
don't think the lady who ordered the bananas flambe should
have been sitting behind you. (She'll be fine in a few weeks,
by the way.)
Since you wrote your reviews, you've been
to Michigan, and witnessed several people performing the same
tricks with the same (very close, at least) handling and dialogue.
You didn't hesitate to admit that none came off as clones
of me!
The reason I push the idea of a "performance
script" is because the "right words" are so
important. Often, they're the crucial difference between success
and embarrassment (although I admit there are self-appointed
magicians out there who are immune to such an emotion).
To paraphrase an American writer: "The
difference between the right words and the almost right words
is the difference between lightning and the lightning bug."
(There are so many references in favor of using the right
words over the arbitrary, everyone on this forum could have
his or her own favorite without duplication.)
Using the exact words doesn't necessarily
make a performance a success or failure, however. The must
be used in the correct context and with the appropriate delivery.
The secret to managing the latter (as any trained actor will
admit) is the SUBTEXT.
The occasional magic performance is often
one's only opportunity to be witty and clever. Why not take
whatever steps necessary to achieve that for yourself and
your audiences. Work from a professional source!
Of course, your source of choice depends upon
whose judgement you trust to follow, your source’s or
your own. (Actually, if you choose a source, that's your choice,
too!) You already know more about you than a source to whom
you’ve never exchanged a word. But, would a trained
writer or director or producer or simply someone with more
experience at achieving what you’re after know more
about how your performance (and persona) come off in front
of an audience?! If you're either a beginner, or have never
been trained in the theatre, these are important considerations.
That's enough of that! My fingers are getting
tired...
Michael Jay: Interestingly,
last night I watched an hour program on PBS about Shakespearian
actors. It was a workshop for aspiring thespians (although
there were several famous actors involved, like Kevin Kline).
I'm a fan of Shakespeare so I was intrigued by the show. The
show itself served to drive home several of your points, as
each actor using the same dialogue interpreted it differently
and didn't come off as clones.
As a bonus, the program helped me to understand
how to link with the audience on their level a bit better.
How important do you feel that it is to study
theater and theatrics in combination with magic and magical
presentation?
Darmoe: O.k. Poor Michael
is nearly the only person picking on you Ron so I thought
I'd ask a silly question about the "distant" past
and its possible revival... do you think there will ever be
another Magic Cruise?
Alternately (and only someone that was around
the Castle in the early 80s would get this) Have you seen
Debra Martel of late?
[I do miss those days... ]
RBauer: Do you mean Vernon's
"girlfriend" Debbie?
Of course you do. No, I haven't seen her since
those days, either. Her picture is in one of the Vernon Chronicles
(I think...).
I missed that cruise.
Mister Toad: I admire the
range of effects that you have devised. From where do you
get your inspiration? Do you start from the base point of
a particular sleight of hand, a favourite patter line or some
particular props?
RBauer: I look for a PREMISE,
i.e., "What if..."
Since magic tricks are typically premise-driven
(consciously or not), I look for ways to clarify and flesh
out a premise so the final effect on the audience is complete.
The premise must be clear, and the payoff must fulfil their
expectations in the same way as any theatrical piece.
For example, "What if I carried three
lucky coins?" Obviously, there must be some story behind
this. Most people would expect that one is enough! Perhaps,
then, since I don't have any lucky experiences to share (clearly
even three weren't enough in my case), there are some "carrying
three coins" experiences... This is the approach I used
to develop the first book in my series, "Gadabout Coins
Revisited."
Sometimes a story developed from a premise
requires more than one magic trick to help illustrate it.
Mister Toad: Hello Ron,
My first impression of your series of magic
booklets was one of awe. I was amazed at how well presented
and professional they looked.
Who did you get to produce the remarkable
front cover illustrations and how did you get to know of this
person?
RBauer: All the covers and
illustrations were executed by Sandra Kort, youngest daughter
of Milton Kort. I've known Sandy since she was about nine
years old. She's older now, and can draw much better than
she did in the old days. (Maybe I shouldn't have said "old"
days!)
|